Uptime Institute Professional Services  
 
Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting
Tier Myths and Misconceptions
In May 2009, Uptime Institute Professional Services expanded its Tier Program with formal initiatives to address the Tier Classification System Myths & Misconceptions prevalent in the industry. The first initiatives include the Tier Standard: Topology, Accredited Tier Designer (curriculum and professional designation), pieces in leading industry publications, and self-published refutations.

Uptime Institute encountered the following Tier Myths and Misconceptions, published on 24 March 2010, during recent site visits in Latin America, Europe, Russia, Africa, and Asia. These myths have taken attention away from the fundamental concepts of the Tier Classification System. The result has been shortfalls in design topology despite adequate budgeting. These shortfalls put the data center's ongoing uptime at risk. Although encountered more often internationally, the myths below have also been noted in North America.

Myth: TIA-942 is a guideline for Uptime Institute Tiers.

Uptime: The similarities between the Uptime Institute Tiers and TIA-942 stop at the surface. Uptime Institute Tiers is functionally disconnected from TIA-942. The core objective of Uptime Institute Tiers is to guide a design topology that will deliver high levels of availability -- as dictated by the owner's business case. Uptime Institute Tiers evaluates data centers by their capability to allow maintenance and to withstand a fault. Uptime Institute Tiers is not available in checklist form. To avoid further confusion, Uptime Institute recommends Roman numbers (I, II, III, IV) to signify Tier-based projects.

Myth: Uptime Institute Tiers is U.S.-centric.

Uptime: The Uptime Institute is currently delivering Tier Certifications in over 25 countries. During the design and construction of these projects, there has not been a conflict between Tiers and local building codes, statutes, or jurisdictions. Tiers, which allows for many solutions and a variety of configurations, gives the engineering and operations team the flexibility to meet both the local regulations and the performance requirements.

Myth: Uptime Institute Tiers requires an EPO.

Uptime: Analysis of the Uptime Institute's Abnormal Incident Report database reveals that accidental EPO activation is a recurring cause of downtime. Uptime Institute Tiers does not mandate an EPO. Unless compelled by a local jurisdiction or code, Uptime Institute does not recommend EPO installation. However, if an EPO is installed, it must also incorporate the Concurrent Maintainability or Fault Tolerant objectives, as specified by the owner.

Myth: Uptime Institute Tiers requires raised floor.

Uptime: The choice of underfloor or overhead cooling is an owner decision based an operational preference. In Uptime Institute experience, a raised floor enhances operational flexibility over the long term. Yet, decisions such as raised floor or on-slab, Cold Aisle/Hot Aisle, containment of Cold/Hot Aisles, and gallery cooling can affect the efficiency of the computer room environment, but are NOT mandated by Uptime Institute Tiers.

Myth: For Tier III and IV, the engine-generator plant must be operational at all times.

Uptime: Data centers will utilize the public electrical utility a majority of the time. However, the engine-generator plant must be properly configured and sized to carry the critical load without runtime limitations. Meeting this criteria requires special attention to the engine-generator capacity ratings and the feeds to the engine-generator plant. In all cases, Uptime Institute Tiers does not require that the engine-generator plant run at all times.

The Uptime Institute has recently released two Accredited Tier Designer Technical Papers. These papers, part of an ongoing series, provide technical clarity on the Tier consequences of specific subsystems. The topics, makeup water source and engine-generator ratings, were identified as areas of concern by attendees from over 13 countries at the 2010 Accredited Tier Designer sessions.

The Accredited Tier Designer Technical Paper Series and Tier Standard: Topology is available at http://uptimeinstitute.com/resources.

If you would like more information on Tier Certification, please click HERE.


The following Tier Myth and Misconception, published on 29 October 2009, addresses the commonly held belief that Tier dictates infrastructure physical security. Tier requirements address the functionality of the data center design topology; Operational Sustainability addresses the risk factors beyond design topology, including infrastructure physical security.

Myth: Re-enforced perimeter fencing is required for Tiers III and IV.

Myth: Physical security measures for outdoor critical equipment (e.g., fuel storage tanks) are a Tier requirement.

Myth: CCTV is required for Tiers III and IV.

Uptime: The Tier Classification System does not prescribe security provisions. Nevertheless, these infrastructure physical security risk factors should be specifically and thoroughly addressed in the owner’s Operational Sustainability requirements.

The level of security is largely determined by industry, the criticality of the IT function performed on site, and the owner’s policies. For example, a financial institution will typically invest in a level of security exceeding that of an academic institution.

There are numerous infrastructure physical security measures which are best practices, regardless of Tier. These include biometric readers, bollards, guard houses, hiding in plain sight, mantraps, re-enforced perimeter fencing, video surveillance, etc. Best practices are critical in reducing the risk exposure of curiosity, mischief, crimes, and accidents. However, best practices should not be confused with Tier requirements.

In order to maintain focus on the Tier requirements, the Uptime Institute has published Tier Standard: Topology, which places the Tiers in a standards format to facilitate practical application. This document puts aside the attributes and illustrations that can lead to confusion. Tier Standard: Topology is available for download HERE.

If you would like more information on Tier Certification, please click HERE.


The following three myths, published on 21 September 2009, finish the discussion begun by Digital Realty Trust's video "Myth of the Month: The Tier System."

Myth: Tiers do not address business requirements.

Uptime: The Tiers are a performance-based, business-case-driven data center benchmarking system. An organization's risk tolerance determines the appropriate Tier for the business. In other words, the Tiers are predicated on the business case of the individual company. Without determination of a unique business case, organizations are misusing the Tiers and bypassing the internal dialogue that needs to occur.

Myth: Tier II provides Concurrent Maintenance opportunities.

Uptime: Tier II ensures redundant capacity components, but requires a shutdown of the computer room for planned maintenance or replacement of critical equipment. The fundamental concept of Tier III is Concurrent Maintenance functionality. Digital Realty Trust asserts the following: "Concurrent Maintainability is actually one of the most important driving design characteristics that you need to have inside your data center. You need to be able to maintain your facility while it's running, regardless of if it's a Tier IV to a Tier II design." Digital Realty Trust mentions Tier II and IV solutions, but disregards Tier III. The requirement to maintain infrastructure without shutting down equipment, known as Concurrent Maintainability, defines Tier III. Many owners' business cases, including healthcare, domestic outsourcers, and state governments, require Tier III. The list of organizations that have protected their investment with Tier III Certification may be found HERE.

Myth: Nobody needs a Tier IV data center.

Uptime: Many owners' business cases require Tier IV, including banking/financial; insurance; outsourcers in UK, Middle East, and South Africa; and federal and provincial governments. (List of Tier IV Certifications may be found here.) The Tiers are not prescriptive. Tier IV is not the best answer for all organizations, neither is Tier II . Experience dictates that owners perform due diligence assessments of their own and outsourcers' facilities to address the following: If the facility is Tier II and by definition does not include Concurrent Maintenance capabilities across all critical subsystems, a) can the business tolerate a maintenance-related shutdown and b) how does the site operations team propose to coordinate a maintenance-related, site-wide shutdown across 10s or even 100s of data center clients?

If you would like more information on Tier Certification, please click HERE.


The following four myths were published on 27 August 2009.

Myth: Utility Feeds

Uptime: The number of utility feeds, substations, and grids that provide public power to the facility neither predicts nor influences Tier.

Myth: Component Count

Uptime: N+1, N+2, S+S, or 2(N+1) does not determine Tier.

Myth: TIA-942

Uptime: Tier Certification is a third-party, independent assessment to the Uptime Institute's Tier Classification System, performed by its Professional Services consultants.

Myth: Site Location

Uptime: Although a critical consideration for the lifecycle operation of the facility, geographical location does not affect Tier

If you would like more information on Tier Certification, please click HERE.

Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting
Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting
Practical Application of the Tiers

If your team is using these myths to define your Tier requirements, there is misdirected attention to elements that do not affect Tier-at the cost of attention to the fundamental concepts. The following resources are available to address these and other misconceptions that add unnecessary cost or complexity to your project.

Tier Standard: Topology - This document presents the Tiers in a standards format to facilitate practical application. There are unauthorized documents circulating that purport to guide to Tier; these documents are either tables excerpted without essential context or blends of attributes, misconceptions, and other benchmarking systems.

Accredited Tier Designer Technical Paper Series - These technical papers are generated per questions and discussions during the Accredited Tier Designer courses. The objective of these papers, for design engineers, is to provide specific topic detail and clarity for consistent application of infrastructure availability Tier concepts in designing the critical environment. Makeup Water and Engine-Generator Ratings are the first two documents in an ongoing series designed to supplement the Tier Standard: Topology.

Accredited Tier Specialist - Building upon the success of Accredited Tier Designer, which accredited 97 elite design engineers in 15 countries in its first year, Uptime Institute announces a partner course for data center managers. Accredited Tier Specialist has similar features as Accredited Tier Designer: education by Uptime Institute Senior faculty and professional designation. Yet, Accredited Tier Specialist was developed for the management team directly responsible for data center uptime. The course also welcomes the outside experts that support the data center manager.

 
Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting
Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting
Uptime Institute Professional Services - data center consultingUptime Institute Professional Services - data center consulting